web2.0 and global sustainability?
I was recently presenting for my class on the issue of Sustainability and Scottish Education. Before that, I had to create a portfolio for a class on Sustainability.
Also recently, I have been looking at this whole web 2.0 concept and also the school 2.0 concept, and feel that for the large part I am only starting to catch up with all that has been going on. Although, I feel that the two link together (sustainability and web 2.0 etc) quite substantially. In-fact, they are inextricably linked. Everybody seems to be talking about the fantastic opportunities web2.0 is giving us. Us? The third of people in the world who have access to a computer? In fact, I think the statistic is that less than a third of the worlds population have access to a phone. I understand that web2.0 has the potential to improve the situation for everyone. Michael Welch, the guy behind the video (that I was probably the last to see) also recognises this:
“So if there is a global village, it is not a very equitable one, and if there is a tragedy of our times, it may be that we are all interconnected but we fail to see it and take care of our relationships with others. For me, the ultimate promise of digital technology is that it might enable us to truly see one another once again and all the ways we are interconnected. It might help us create a truly global view that can spark the kind of empathy we need to create a better world for all of humankind. I’m not being overly utopian and naively saying that the Web will make this happen.”
But do the majority recognise this? Though the real question on my mind is what are we really doing to create this ’spark’? The potential is there, though as of yet I have not seen any thing with true purpose as to increasing a global sustainable awareness through new technology. It literally seems a bit self centred (in structure). I do credit that a lot of people are doing a lot of good things for creating sustainable schools and communities. We are in the Decade of Education for Sustainable Development aren’t we? I see the $100 dollar laptop project doing fantastic stuff (though it makes me wonder about priorities). I see that everyone is going along this whole new technology idea with the right intentions. But I wonder what is happening? I wonder if we keep going down the route of ‘the next better thing for ourselves’ we will create an even greater divide with those who clearly don’t have the same opportunities.
No one person can change the world but is there a real common focus on doing so within Education? I guess when I start teaching in August, my answer may be that I can only do the best in my own classroom - I can only educate the pupils I see on a daily basis. I wonder though, is it only because I am not a teacher yet and don’t fully understand the realities of teaching life that I am questioning this perspective?
February 25th, 2007 at 3:57 pm
Why is it Web 2.0 Vs Global sustainablity? That implies they are mutually exclusive.
The think their are challenges. As with all technologies the use (or misuse) of the technologies has a major impact. The example of Alfred Noble and the invention of Dynamite is an example of this. He thought this would be the perfect peace maker.
This is a problem as a society we must face these issues. The example of Africa is an interesting one. At resent most of Africa seems to be bypassing the wired technologies and moving direct to wireless.
As for the OLPC programme. Yes their is a danger of the Magic Bullet. No such thing exists but with the right structure and planning Technology can help.
Ian
PS Useful inks
TED
Ross Lovegrove - Great Designer
February 25th, 2007 at 5:24 pm
Firstly I’d like to say I changed the title of this post from ‘versus’ to ‘and’ (I would have liked to use the strikethrough thing but I don’t know how (yet). I agree- the two concepts are inextricably linked.
Secondly, I don’t mind if I don’t get another comment on this blog as your link to TED was fantastic. I came across this video from Richard Baraniuk which almost completely answered the questions in my post.
The link to Ross Lovegrove was also inspiring in so many ways - though would need a degree of editing before shown to pupils! I loved his idea of the car/lampost inspired from a water droplet - a genius idea by thinking out of the box.
February 26th, 2007 at 4:27 am
It’s funny, I came here to add a comment linking to TED too. Just on the OLPC topic I wondered what you meant by priorities - Nicholas Negroponte’s TED presentation explains a lot about the principles behind the $100 laptop project.
February 26th, 2007 at 2:23 pm
Shhhhh…………
I play to the higher product design class with no editng but the door closed